WAS IT AN ERROR.
In our February issue the argument of a contemporary, that Paul made mistakes and misquoted, we answered by quoting and properly punctuating the Psalm referred to. Our contemporary, in its last issue, effects to treat the argument lightly, and pretends to quote our argument. It appears to do so, but strangely enough omits the very pith of the quotation, upon which our argument rested. Was this a mistake--an accident--or did our contemporary think it would be more like a misquotation thus? Charity bids us hope it was a mistake.